Master’s Degree in Forensic Psychology

The objectives of the PPGPFOR Master’s Program are to:

• Produce legal and psychological knowledge regarding human behavior within Brazilian and international legal frameworks;
• Describe, explain, predict, understand, and intervene in human behavior within forensic contexts;
• Create or adapt forensic tools to support diagnostics and interventions with forensic populations;
• Develop protocols for assessment and intervention in forensic clinics;
• Foster the development of professional skills relevant to the legal system;
• Contribute to the enhancement of public policy and legislation through research;
• Develop preventive and educational actions to reduce vulnerabilities.

Doctorate in Forensic Psychology

The objectives of the PPGPFOR Doctoral Program are to:

• Build advanced expertise in Forensic Assessment: Doctoral candidates should be capable of conducting rigorous and ethical assessments across various domains of forensic psychology;
• Develop skills in Clinical Intervention: Candidates are expected to perform advanced interventions in forensic clinical contexts with a variety of clients, including victims, perpetrators, families, and professionals;
• Establish National and International Partnerships: Graduates should be capable of building and maintaining collaborations to amplify the program’s social impact;
• Promote the Training of Faculty and Researchers: The program prepares graduates to work in academia and research, contributing to advancements in the field;
• Support Research Production and Dissemination: Doctoral candidates are encouraged to produce high-quality research and contribute to the dissemination of legal and psychological knowledge related to human behavior;
• Foster the Development and Evaluation of Protocols: The ability to design and evaluate forensic clinical protocols is key;
• Contribute to Legislative Reform: Graduates are encouraged to propose legal changes based on empirical research;
• Encourage Critical Research and Innovation: Candidates should develop innovative and critical research approaches that contribute to legal system technologies while respecting cultural differences;
• Validate Preventive and Educational Actions: The ability to assess the validity of interventions aimed at reducing vulnerability in diverse contexts is fundamental;
• Promote Academic and Institutional Excellence: The program seeks excellence, encouraging high-quality academic and institutional activities recognized within and beyond the university;
• Address the Demand for Forensic Psychology Training: Graduates are expected to meet the growing demand for advanced training in the field across Paraná and Brazil. These goals prepare professionals not only with deep theoretical knowledge but with the practical, ethical, and innovative skills required in the workplace.

Forensic Psychology is the psychological field that interfaces with the legal system in its many branches. It merges two historically distinct professions: psychology, which studies human behavior, and law, which studies how people establish rules for social behavior.

This field includes all subdisciplines of psychology—clinical, developmental, social, cognitive, etc.—that focus on describing, explaining, predicting, and intervening in human behavior in forensic contexts. Its ultimate goal is to support the development and application of objective, fair legal systems.

Forensic Psychology was formally recognized in 1970 by the American Psychological Association (APA) as Division 41, named Psychology, Law, and Society.

Forensic Assessment is the core of this field. It informs referrals, interventions, prevention strategies, public policies, and the creation of forensic tools. Studies focusing on specific laws (e.g., the Child and Adolescent Statute, the Elderly Statute, anti-bullying laws, Parental Alienation Law) assess the relevance and effectiveness of legal frameworks and support the creation of new evidence-based policies, laws, and protocols to better address violence in society.

The forensic field also engages with police psychology, forensic clinics, criminology, victimology, and correctional psychology. Research focuses on understanding these populations and creating targeted interventions.

Practice settings include organizations serving socially vulnerable populations (shelters, NGOs, social service centers), courts (family, criminal, youth), correctional institutions, youth rehabilitation centers, schools, businesses, and communities. Studies involve victims, offenders, their families, those working with these groups (teachers, technical staff, correctional officers), and legal professionals (judges, prosecutors, attorneys, police).

The field also allows for consulting and advising in legal contexts, helping shape public strategies and policies that more effectively address the interface between psychology and law.

A major strength of the Master’s and Doctoral programs in Forensic Psychology at Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná is their deep integration with society. The faculty is recognized by public and professional institutions as a source of expertise for training, services, and collaborative development.

The program engages in initiatives that aim to:

• Strengthen academic and scientific partnerships with public and private institutions (NGOs, municipalities, state departments, public schools, law enforcement, family courts, etc.);
• Support human resource training through courses, lectures, and intervention programs;
• Offer consulting and advisory services in councils and committees;
• Disseminate research nationally and internationally;
• Provide specialized care through projects and the Forensic Psychology Research and Intervention Center (NUFOR-UTP).

PPGPFOR has two research lines:

• Forensic Assessment, Intervention, and Clinic
• Violence and Society

FORENSIC ASSESSMENT, INTERVENTION, AND CLINIC

Forensic assessment is a type of psychological evaluation conducted within legal contexts. This research line aims to develop studies related to the creation, adaptation, and validation of forensic instruments. Research in this area demonstrates that forensic assessment tools can measure behaviors pre- and post-intervention, supporting the evaluation of prevention and intervention programs.

Studies focus on characterizing or creating profiles and typologies of individuals involved in criminal behavior, considering personality, behavioral, and demographic traits (e.g., parricide offenders, domestic abusers, psychopaths, sexual offenders). They also evaluate psychological and behavioral characteristics of specific forensic populations in different contexts, including sheltered children and adolescents, prison officers, alienated and alienating parents, victims of abuse, elderly individuals exposed to violence, and others.

This research line is particularly fruitful, as the practical applicability of its findings supports decision-making in areas such as referrals (e.g., institutionalization or release) and interventions.

Interventions in forensic contexts—whether clinical or preventive—are directed toward forensic populations. Research aims to develop protocols and intervention programs for individuals referred by the justice system (family, juvenile, criminal courts), as well as for police officers, correctional agents, and socially vulnerable populations.

Studies under this line propose different intervention and clinical models, aiming to evaluate program effectiveness (through pre- and post-tests) and to analyze intervention processes. Research into the feasibility of prevention and intervention programs for at-risk and vulnerable groups seeks to offer solutions to antisocial and criminal behavior across prevention levels (primary, secondary, tertiary).

Projects focus on developing and testing the effectiveness of protocols and techniques applied to various forensic client groups (e.g., institutionalized youth, foster parents, social educators, youth in conflict with the law, victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence, and victims of sexual abuse).

Finally, research in this line may generate academic and pedagogical impact by producing manuals and structured training programs for professional development.

Faculty Members:

• Adriano Valério dos Santos Azevêdo
• André Vilela Komatsu
• Carlos Aznar Blefari
• Bruno Bonfá Araújo
• Fernanda Otoni da Silva
• João Paulo Araújo Lessa
• Paula Inez Cunha Gomide
• Sidnei Rinaldo Priolo Filho
• Tiago Gagliano Pinto Alberto

VIOLENCE AND SOCIETY

This research line investigates structural violence, focusing on power imbalances and the processes of social inclusion and exclusion of individuals or groups.

Studies address the violence experienced by children/adolescents, intimate partners, the elderly, immigrants and/or refugees, LGBTQIA+ individuals, Black populations, people experiencing homelessness, and incarcerated persons. They also investigate discrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender, and body type.

Key topics include:

• Structural racism
• LGBTQ+ discrimination
• Fatphobia
• Ageism
• State-perpetrated violence
• Domestic, workplace, school, and community violence

Research explores life narratives, social representations, support networks, and violence prevention programs. It also analyzes institutions and services where professionals implement public policies and intervention strategies across different contexts.

These studies promote the analysis of the complexity of structural violence in dialogue with legislation and public policies, offering critical insights and sociopolitical alternatives for violence prevention.

In the context of Forensic Psychology, this line fosters social participation, citizenship, and human rights, aiming to promote social justice and to stimulate reflections and improvements in public policy.

Faculty Members:

• Adriano Valério dos Santos Azevêdo
• Denise de Camargo
• Gislei Mocelin Polli
• Maria Cristina Antunes

FACULTY RESEARCH PROJECTS – RESEARCH LINE: FORENSIC ASSESSMENT, INTERVENTION, AND CLINIC

FACULTY: ADRIANO AZEVÊDO

Title: Domestic Violence: Forensic Assessment and Intervention

Research Problem:
Forensic assessment and intervention in the context of domestic violence have been widely discussed and recognized in the justice system. How can forensic assessment and intervention support efforts to address domestic violence?

General Objective:
To develop, apply, and validate forensic assessment and intervention strategies for addressing domestic violence.

Specific Objectives:

• Apply forensic assessment tools in domestic violence cases;
• Develop forensic assessment instruments for domestic violence;
• Validate forensic protocols for assessment and intervention;
• Propose guidelines for forensic assessment and intervention within the justice system.

Literature Review:
Forensic assessment and intervention in domestic violence cases have supported professional decision-making and judicial procedures. Forensic assessment is a viable strategy to inform evidence-based interventions, such as reflective groups and accountability programs for male perpetrators. Therefore, it is necessary to advance and systematize such interventions with solid theoretical and methodological foundations (Beiras, Nascimento & Incrocci, 2021).

Research Type:
Mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative), including cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Sample:
Male perpetrators of violence against women, female victims, and professionals working in the field.

Instruments and Techniques:
Standardized or under-validation assessment tools; intervention protocols; semi-structured interviews.

Data Analysis:
Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis for quantitative data; Grounded Theory analysis for qualitative data.

Timeline:

• 2022: Bibliometric study on academic production about violence against women; study on the contributions of reflective groups for male perpetrators (pre- and post-intervention assessments).
• 2023: Qualitative study with facilitators of reflective groups.
• 2025–2026: Two ongoing studies:
  • One focused on designing, implementing, and assessing the impact of a reflective group on variables such as aggressiveness and anger, with the aim of building a forensic intervention protocol.
  • The second will apply assessment tools to incarcerated women.

Expected Outcomes:
To support justice professionals by offering evidence-based strategies for best practices in forensic assessment and intervention.

Reference:
Beiras, A., Nascimento, M., & Incrocci, C. (2019). Programs for men who perpetrate violence against women: an overview of interventions in Brazil. Saúde e Sociedade, 28(1), 262–274.

Current Graduate Students:
Geraldo Tadeu Jorge Filho, Larissa Borges Dias Souto.

FACULTY: CARLOS AZNAR BLEFARI

Title: Strategies for Managing Sexual Violence Against Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the Protection Network

Research Problem:
Children and adolescents with ASD are at increased risk of sexual violence. Forensic literature is scarce, and the protection network lacks specific tools to prevent institutional violence.

General Objective:
To understand how the protection network manages suspected cases of sexual violence involving children and adolescents with ASD.

Specific Objectives:

1. Map evidence on forensic practices in managing such cases;
2. Identify methods and strategies used by the protection network;
3. Develop a handbook of evidence-based practices for management and assessment.

Literature Review:
Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a serious public health issue with severe physical, psychological, and social impacts. Children with disabilities—especially ASD—are more vulnerable due to communication barriers and the risk of misinterpreting abuse signs as diagnostic traits (Dupont et al., 2021; UNICEF, 2013; Nowak, 2015). Literature on the topic is particularly limited in low- and middle-income countries.

Methodology:
Three studies will be conducted:

1. Scoping review using the PRISMA-ScR method;
2. Exploratory qualitative study (snowball sampling, thematic analysis);
3. Methodological study to develop an evidence-based practice guide.

Timeline:

• Study 1: July 2024 – July 2025
• Study 2: March 2025 – March 2026
• Study 3: March – December 2026

Expected Outcomes and Contributions:
This project aims to develop specific, evidence-based strategies for protecting this population and reducing the impact of CSA on children with ASD.

References:

• Dupont et al. (2022)
• Nowak (2015)
• UNICEF (2013)

Current Graduate Students:
Fernanda Maluf Magnabosco, Rafael Diego de Freitas, Thiago Dombroski de Fonseca

FACULTY: FERNANDA OTONI

Title: Assessment and Intervention in Forensic Neuropsychology: Human Behavior and Legal Consequences

Research Problem:
How can the validation of instruments enhance forensic neuropsychological assessment and intervention, improve the accuracy of expert reports, and support judicial decisions?

General Objective:
To develop and validate instruments for forensic neuropsychological assessment and intervention.

Specific Objectives:

• Identify neuropsychiatric disorders with legal impact;
• Create forensic neuropsychological assessment tools;
• Validate intervention protocols for victims and perpetrators;
• Propose guidelines for applying neuropsychological evaluations in legal settings.

Literature Review:
Forensic neuropsychological assessments clarify the neuropsychiatric effects on victims and perpetrators, aiding judicial decisions. The lack of validated tools compromises expert accuracy, making standardized protocols essential. Neuroscience applied to law enhances sentencing, aiding in evaluating criminal responsibility and decision-making (Cortez et al., 2025; Cortez & Otoni, 2022; Lima-Costa & Gomide, 2024; Otoni et al., 2025).

Research Type:
Mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative); cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.

Sample:
Perpetrators, victims, legal professionals, and mental health professionals.

Instruments and Techniques:
Standardized neuropsychological tests; semi-structured interviews; legal case file analysis.

Data Analysis:
Descriptive and inferential statistics (Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Modeling); Similarity Analysis for qualitative data.

Timeline:
Since 2023, research has aimed to improve forensic evaluation.

• 2024: Dissertations addressed psychosocial assessment, criminal cognition, and moral behavior.
• 2025–2026: Studies on psychiatric disorders and personality among incarcerated women will be finalized, contributing to instrument validation and publication.

Expected Outcomes:
To develop effective tools for forensic neuropsychological assessment, supporting judicial decisions and promoting more equitable justice.

References:
Cortez, P. A. et al. (2025), Cortez & Otoni (2022), Lima-Costa & Gomide (2024), Otoni et al. (2025)

Current Graduate Students:
Analu Zimermann Lehmkuhl, Victoria Sobreira Gonçalves, Thiago Vinicius Sávio, Luciana de Campos Cheres

FACULTY: JOÃO PAULO ARAÚJO LESSA

Title: Measurement Instruments, Assessment, and Intervention in Forensic Psychology: From Human Development to Offending Behavior

Research Problem:
How to develop and adapt culturally sensitive and psychometrically robust assessment and intervention instruments, based on well-established theoretical models (e.g., CHC theory of intelligence, Big Five personality traits, dimensional models of psychopathology), for use in diverse forensic contexts?

General Objective:
To develop and adapt culturally appropriate and psychometrically sound instruments for forensic contexts, based on consistent theoretical models and aligned with social needs.

Specific Objectives:

1. Identify major gaps in forensic psychological assessment through literature reviews (systematic and integrative);
2. Map instruments based on CHC (intelligence), Big Five (personality), dimensional psychopathology, and socio-emotional competencies;
3. Conduct cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation of these instruments;
4. Implement empirical studies (cross-sectional and/or longitudinal) to test intervention effectiveness in forensic populations;
5. Propose policy recommendations and best practices for forensic psychology.

Theoretical Framework:
Grounded in international standards for psychological testing (AERA et al., 2014), the project integrates research on adolescent risk behaviors, offending behavior, and intergenerational transmission of conduct. Advanced statistical models (e.g., SEM) will help deepen understanding of psychosocial dynamics linked to antisocial behavior.

Research Type:
Mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative); cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.

Sample:
School-aged adolescents, juvenile offenders, and young adults aged 18–30.

Instruments and Techniques:
Self-report measures (identified through literature review); structured and semi-structured interviews.

Data Analysis:
Descriptive and inferential statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, regressions, reliability and validity testing. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content and thematic analysis.

Timeline:

• 2024: Literature reviews initiated.
• 2025–2026: At least two dissertations on offending behavior and antisocial conduct will be defended, along with article submissions to peer-reviewed journals (impact factor ≥ 1.0).

Expected Outcomes:
To deliver culturally sensitive, psychometrically valid instruments and evidence-based interventions. These tools may enhance rehabilitation programs and inform best practices and public policy in forensic psychology.

References:
AERA et al. (2014), Araújo et al. (2019), Coutinho et al. (2013), Farrell et al. (2018, 2022), Blunch (2016)

Current Graduate Students:
Dayane Gabrielle Turassa (Master’s), Mayara Santin Ribeiro (Master’s)

FACULTY: MARIA CRISTINA ANTUNES

Title: Assessment of Sexual Abuse Victims and Non-Offending Family Members

Research Problem:
Are psychotherapeutic interventions effective in minimizing the psychological consequences experienced by sexual abuse survivors and their non-offending family members?

General Objective:
To develop and evaluate a psychotherapeutic intervention model for sexual abuse survivors and non-offending family members assisted by the SAVV-UTP service.

Specific Objectives:

1. Assess psychological symptoms in sexual abuse victims and their non-offending family members;
2. Describe the profile of patients assisted by SAVV;
3. Analyze the impact of abuse disclosure;
4. Develop, adapt, and validate tools to identify violence and evaluate intervention programs.

Literature Review:
Sexual abuse (SA) is among the least reported crimes, often remaining a secret throughout victims’ lives (Gomes & Antunes, 2023). It can cause short-, medium-, and long-term psychological consequences and lead to STIs, unwanted pregnancies, substance abuse, and suicide risk (Brockstedt et al., 2025; Hailes et al., 2019; Merrick et al., 2018). International studies show high incidence of eating disorders, PTSD, depression, and anxiety among SA survivors (Chouliara et al., 2019; Pulverman et al., 2018). Some research highlights the emotional impact on non-offending family members, as disclosure of abuse can deeply affect family dynamics (Gomes et al., 2024).

Research Type:
Mixed-methods longitudinal study combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to comprehensively analyze intervention outcomes.

Sample:
Approximately 500 participants including children, adolescents, adults, and elderly SA survivors, as well as non-offending family members.

Instruments and Techniques:

• ASEBA battery (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment) to assess behavioral and emotional problems across age groups (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2003);
• Self-administered sociodemographic questionnaire (Appendix 3), completed before interventions, including 24 open and closed questions regarding demographics, socioeconomic status, abuse details, and impact of disclosure.

Data Analysis:

• Quantitative: pre- and post-intervention data analyzed using descriptive statistics, parametric and non-parametric tests.
• Qualitative: content analysis of interviews and clinical reports to identify response patterns and categories.

Timeline:
August 2020 to December 2030.

Expected Outcomes:
The study aims to expand understanding of short-, medium-, and long-term psychological effects of SA on victims and families. It will contribute to the development of more effective treatment strategies and public policies that support sexual abuse survivors and their support networks.

References:

• Achenbach & Rescorla (2003)
• Brockstedt et al. (2025)
• Chouliara et al. (2019)
• Gomes & Antunes (2023, 2024)
• Hailes et al. (2019)
• Merrick et al. (2018)
• Pulverman et al. (2018)

Current Graduate Students:
Emily Karina Lima Duarte, Jacqueline Battaglin Fontoura

FACULTY: PAULA INEZ CUNHA GOMIDE

Project 1: Parental Alienation – Concept, Legislation, and Measurement Instruments

(Ongoing since 2011)

Research Problem:
What are the key concepts and criteria for the forensic evaluation and intervention in families presenting indicators of parental alienation?

General Objective:
To identify the concepts and criteria for forensic assessment and intervention in family members showing signs of parental alienation.

Specific Objectives:

1. Review literature to define concepts and evaluation criteria for parental alienation (PA);
2. Identify standardized instruments used in PA assessment;
3. Assess the psychometric properties of the Parental Alienation Scale (EAP) using forensic samples;
4. Develop and evaluate a protocol to identify profiles of alienating and alienated parents;
5. Assess the psychological impact of PA on children involved in custody disputes;
6. Design and deliver a training course for experts and professionals in PA forensic assessment;
7. Develop and apply an intervention program for alienating parents and their children;
8. Draft and submit the EAP Manual to SATEPSI;
9. Analyze Brazil’s Parental Alienation Law (Law 12.318/2010), its implementation, and potential revisions.

Literature Review:
Parental alienation occurs in custody disputes when one parent unjustifiably disrupts the child’s relationship with the other parent, damaging their image. Although the term has existed since 1985, it remains vague and controversial. There is a lack of empirical studies on the characteristics of involved parents and children, as well as a lack of validated Brazilian tools or intervention protocols for PA.

Methodology:
Data will be collected from both forensic (experimental) and non-forensic (control) samples using quantitative and qualitative methods, including case studies.

Instruments:

• Parental Alienation Scale (EAP)
• Personality Interview (E-TRAP)
• Parental Styles Inventory (IEP)
• Marital Social Skills Inventory (IHSC)
• Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), among others

Analyses will include descriptive statistics, factor analysis, content analysis, and parametric and non-parametric methods.

Timeline:
Specific objectives are tied to student research projects and must be completed within the 30-month duration of the Master’s program.

Expected Outcomes:
Most objectives are expected to be achieved within the current four-year research cycle. Incomplete objectives will be updated in the next cycle. Misuse of the PA concept and inadequate assessment practices, often influenced by legal literature and Brazil’s current legislation, can harm families and lead to poor legal and psychological decisions.

References:
Gomide, P.I.C. (2024); Maurici et al. (2025); Brazil (2010); Maccarten (2022); Darnall (2008); Lorandos et al. (2013); Lorandos & Bernet (2020); Hynan (2014)

Current Graduate Students:
Adan Henrique da Silva, Pietra Vons Dallegrave

Project 2: Parenting Styles and Antisocial Behavior

(Ongoing since 2011)

Research Problem:
What is the relationship between parenting styles and antisocial behavior?

General Objective:
To identify correlations between parenting styles and antisocial behaviors.

Specific Objectives:

1. Develop and validate the Family Offense History Inventory (IHIF);
2. Revalidate the Parental Styles Inventory (IEP), 20 years after its initial publication;
3. Review national studies using the IEP;
4. Conduct a systematic review of international and national tools for assessing parenting practices;
5. Apply parenting programs to various groups: parents of abuse victims, school bullies, parents involved in PA cases, and parents of juvenile offenders;
6. Evaluate the parenting styles of intimate partner aggressors;
7. Compare parenting styles between same-sex and heterosexual adoptive couples;
8. Translate and adapt a protocol comprising 12 international instruments to assess adolescents in conflict with the law.

Literature Review:
Parenting style refers to consistent practices used to educate and manage children’s behavior. Gomide’s (2006) theoretical model includes seven parenting practices: two positive (positive monitoring and moral behavior) and five negative (neglect, physical abuse, negative monitoring, inconsistent punishment, and lax discipline). These practices correlate with the development of either prosocial or antisocial behavior. Intergenerational patterns of parenting are seen as a major risk factor for antisocial conduct.

Methodology:
Methodologies will vary by objective:

• IHIF will be applied to 800 individuals (400 university students and 400 incarcerated individuals);
• IEP revalidation will include updated samples and advanced psychometric analysis;
• PRISMA will guide systematic reviews;
• Parenting programs will use elective samples with experimental and control groups, measured through pre- and post-tests;
• Protocol adaptation will include 400 adolescents in youth detention and 400 in schools, with cross-cultural comparisons involving Portuguese adolescents.

Timeline:
Objectives are aligned with student projects and will be completed within the 30-month Master’s program duration.

Expected Outcomes:
Most objectives are expected to be completed within the current research cycle. Unmet goals will be revised for the next cycle. Parenting styles can serve as both risk and protective factors depending on whether they are negative or positive. Evidence-based training programs will increase intervention effectiveness.

References:
Gomide & Otoni (2025); Patterson et al. (1992); Hagan (2010); Bartol & Bartol (2015); Gomide (2021); Heide (2013); Rocha (2012); Gomide & Dallaqua (2022)

Current Graduate Student:
Bruna Marques Saraiva

FACULTY: SIDNEI PRIOLO FILHO

Project 1: Assessment and Intervention with Professionals Working in the Field of Child Protection and Intimate Partner Violence

Research Problem:
How can we assess mental health aspects and develop interventions that improve knowledge and skills among professionals working to protect women and children?

Objectives:
a) Assess mental health factors and related risk/protective variables among professionals;
b) Develop, apply, and evaluate interventions to improve how professionals handle risk situations involving intimate partner violence (IPV);
c) Evaluate the working conditions and individual factors that influence professionals involved in these fields.

Literature Review:
IPV and child abuse have high prevalence rates in Brazil. Psychology has aimed to identify variables that contribute to higher-quality services provided by professionals who work in such violent contexts.

Methodology:
Projects will employ group comparison strategies (control vs. intervention) using pre- and post-test measures and, when possible, follow-ups. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches will be used.

Timeline:
Specific objectives are tied to student research projects and are to be completed within the 30-month duration of the Master’s program.

Expected Outcomes and Contributions:
Evaluations will consider both contextual and occupational factors affecting these professionals, seeking practical solutions to improve working conditions and, consequently, the quality of services provided to families exposed to violence.

References:

• Katz et al. (2023). The global impact of COVID-19 on child protection professionals
• Katz et al. (2024). Examining resilience among child protection professionals during COVID-19
• Katz et al. (2021). Child protection service responses during COVID-19
• Priolo Filho et al. (2020). Brazilian child protection professionals’ resilient behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic

Current Graduate Students:
Ana Licia de Lima Morais, Matheus Chequim Carrascoso

Project 2: Identification, Intervention, and Evaluation of Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)

Research Problem:
Which variables are important for identifying, intervening, and evaluating cases of intimate partner violence?

Objectives:
Considering the need to understand this phenomenon in the Brazilian context, this project aims to:
a) Identify risk and protective factors for IPV exposure (e.g., sexual perception, family history);
b) Identify risk and protective factors related to the psychological consequences of IPV;
c) Investigate individual, family, and social characteristics associated with resilience among victims;
d) Develop instruments for assessing various aspects related to IPV.

Literature Review:
Intervening in cases of violence requires knowledge of the trajectory and consequences of such behaviors. IPV has distinct characteristics shaped by cultural and contextual factors.

Methodology:
The study will include population samples and demographic data to identify risk/protective factors. A mixed-methods approach will be used. Participants who have experienced IPV will be selected to assess outcomes aligned with the specific objectives.

Timeline:
As with all PPGPFOR projects, the timeline is aligned with the 30-month Master’s program.

Expected Outcomes and Contributions:
Findings will contribute to understanding IPV in Brazil and support the development of targeted prevention strategies.

References:

• Gregori, Priolo Filho, & França (2022). Assessment of Beliefs about Dating Violence (ACVN)
• Vieira et al. (2024). Integrative review of Brazilian literature on batterers
• Priolo Filho et al. (2019). Jealousy and anxiety in male domestic abusers: A comparative study

Current Graduate Students:
None at this time.

Project 3: Theory of Mind – Investigations with Children and Adults on Social Aspects

Research Problem:
How do individuals make decisions about social and forensic matters?

Objective:
This project seeks to investigate current topics in social relationships, such as immigration, religious freedom, jury trial decision-making, and moral judgments.

Literature Review:
Theory of Mind (ToM) has been widely explored in the field of human development through various experimental strategies. One common approach involves presenting real-world-like scenarios in controlled environments where participants must make decisions regarding rights, access to resources, or service distribution. While this research is well-developed in the U.S., similar studies are still limited in Brazil.

Methodology:
A key goal is to conduct cross-cultural research to identify similarities and differences across age groups in different countries. Studies will be both cross-sectional and longitudinal, and will include qualitative and quantitative data collection.

Timeline:
Specific objectives are aligned with graduate student research projects and will be carried out over the standard 30-month Master’s period.

Expected Outcomes and Contributions:
This project is conducted in collaboration with the University of California – Davis and Florida International University. The research will help build knowledge about the development of Theory of Mind, which may lead to new strategies to enhance ToM itself and related constructs such as empathy, moral behavior, and altruism.

References:

• Goldfarb et al. (2017). How generic language and criminal sanctions shape social categorization
• Lagattuta (2014). Children’s ability to connect mental states and emotions across time
• Lagattuta et al. (2015). Further development in children’s understanding of mind and emotion

Current Graduate Students:
Renan de Barros Hoinski, Priscila Kavalli

FACULTY RESEARCH PROJECTS – RESEARCH LINE: VIOLENCE AND SOCIETY

FACULTY: ADRIANO AZEVÊDO

Project 1: Institutional Foster Care

Research Problem:
Institutional foster care is a protection policy for socially vulnerable children and adolescents. What are the main strategies used in these foster settings?

General Objective:
To identify and understand the strategies used in institutional foster care for children and adolescents.

Specific Objectives:

• Identify professional practices within institutional foster care;
• Develop guidelines to systematize best practices in institutional care.

Literature Review:
Institutional foster care, as outlined by Brazilian legislation such as the Child and Adolescent Statute (Brazil, 1990), has advanced significantly in protecting children’s rights. However, there is a clear need to improve the training of professionals, particularly in continuous education for social educators.

Research Type:
Qualitative study, including both cross-sectional and longitudinal research.

Sample:
Children and adolescents in institutional care, and the social educators working with them.

Instruments and Techniques:
Semi-structured interviews.

Data Analysis:
Grounded Theory.

Timeline:
In 2021, a qualitative study was conducted with social educators using interviews and analysis of photographs related to their professional practices.

Expected Outcomes:
To support social educators in developing effective interventions that promote child and adolescent protection.

Reference:
Brazil (1990). Child and Adolescent Statute. Brasília, DF.

Current Graduate Student:
Sidney Issao Ito

Project 2: Social Support Networks in Coping with Violence

Research Problem:
Social support networks help individuals facing emotionally impactful situations, such as violence. What support networks are being used to cope with violence?

General Objective:
To identify social support networks used in cases of violence.

Specific Objectives:

• Identify the structure and function of social support networks;
• Understand the nature of social bonds within these networks.

Literature Review:
Social support networks consist of individuals and institutions offering care and assistance, acting as protective factors (Sluzki, 1997). In various forms of violence (e.g., sexual violence, violence against women, children, and adolescents), these networks are essential in building new pathways for recovery and coping.

Research Type:
Qualitative study, including cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches.

Sample:
Individuals and families with a history of exposure to violence.

Instruments and Techniques:

• Social Support Network Mapping;
• Semi-structured interviews.

Data Analysis:
Analysis of support network maps and Grounded Theory.

Timeline:
In 2021, a study was conducted with adult women who were victims of childhood sexual abuse. A new study is currently underway, focusing on the support networks of families of child and adolescent victims of sexual violence.

Expected Outcomes:
To identify and understand social support networks, thereby enabling new care strategies across social services, healthcare, and justice systems.

Reference:
Sluzki, C. E. (1997). The Social Network in Systemic Practice: Therapeutic Alternatives. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Current Graduate Student:
Luciane de Fátima Gonçalves Seguro

FACULTY: DENISE DE CAMARGO

Title: Practices of Violence at the Intersection of Law, Psychology, and Culture

Research Problem:
How does structural violence manifest and affect individuals and their communities?

General Objective:
To deepen theoretical and methodological studies on research at the intersection of Law, Psychology, and Culture.

Specific Objectives:

• Conduct studies on social discourse and practices, identifying how they contribute to the manifestation of violence;
• Investigate discursive and material practices related to stigmatization, discrimination, harassment, and exclusion, with the goal of mapping their interactions and consequences on personal and societal levels.

Literature Review:
The literature review will address theories on structural violence, focusing on how violence is embedded in social structures and institutional practices. The cultural dimension will be examined through theoretical contributions from Practice Theory (Nicolini, 2017), which sees the world as shaped through routine, repeated practices. This approach also applies to social structures such as family, authority, institutions, and organizations (Gherardi, 2016).

Methodology:
This is a matrix-based qualitative study employing an ethnographic design to describe and analyze social practices linked to structural violence.

Data Collection Methods:

• Participant observation in contexts where violence is present in social interactions;
• Semi-structured interviews with victims and professionals in Law and Psychology;
• Document analysis of court cases, intervention programs, and public policies;
• Focus groups with stakeholders to explore their perceptions and experiences related to violence.

Data Analysis:
A historical and contextual approach will be applied to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon, taking into account its social and cultural roots.

Expected Outcomes:

• Map structural violence practices at the intersections of Law, Psychology, and Culture;
• Identify gaps and areas for improvement in social practices and institutional responses to violence (judicial and educational);
• Generate data that support the development of more inclusive and effective public policies for addressing structural violence.

References:

• Gherardi, S. (2016). Sociomateriality in posthuman practice theory. In The Nexus of Practices, pp. 50–63.
• Nicolini, D. (2017). Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.

ADMISSION PROCESS

MASTER’S PROGRAM

At the time of application, the candidate must submit the following documents:

• Completed application form (available on the website);
• Letter of intent;
• National ID (RG) and taxpayer number (CPF);
• Copy of birth, marriage, or legal name change certificate;
• One recent 3×4 cm photo;
• Authenticated copy of undergraduate diploma;
• Undergraduate transcript;
• Proof of residence;
• Updated and documented Curriculum Lattes (available at www.cnpq.br).

DOCTORAL PROGRAM

At the time of application, the candidate must submit the following documents:

• Completed application form (available on the website);
• Letter of intent;
• National ID (RG) and taxpayer number (CPF);
• Copy of birth, marriage, or legal name change certificate;
• One recent 3×4 cm photo;
• Authenticated copy of undergraduate diploma;
• Authenticated copy of Master’s diploma;
• Master’s transcript;
• Proof of residence;
• Certificate of English proficiency or proof of having passed an English exam;
• 15-page research project;
• Updated and documented Curriculum Lattes (available at www.cnpq.br).

SELECTION EXAM – ANNUAL

The selection process occurs annually and consists of two phases:

1. Eliminatory Phase:
2. a) Language Proficiency Testin English or Spanish
   Doctoral candidates will take the Spanish test, as proof of English proficiency is submitted at application;
   b) Written Exam.
3. Qualifying Phases:
4. a) Curriculum Vitae evaluation(Curriculum Lattes);
   b) Interview.

To advance beyond the eliminatory phase, candidates must score at least 7.0 (on a scale of 0 to 10) on each of the tests.

The written exam is prepared by faculty based on a bibliography published on the Forensic Psychology Master’s website.

Both the language proficiency and written exams are evaluated by the program’s faculty.

Candidates approved in the eliminatory phase proceed to the qualifying phase. At that point, the Curriculum Lattes will be evaluated and selected candidates will be invited for an interview.

AVAILABLE SPOTS

• 20 positions for the Master’s program
• 10 positions for the Doctoral program (annually)

Students will be assigned to advisors based on their research line and the advisor’s interest in the student’s project.

Each semester, regular students must enroll during the period set by the Program Coordination. The advisor must approve the student’s course selections.

Classes are held weekly on Mondays and Tuesdays, in the morning, afternoon, and evening.

Please refer to the Admission Call Notice for further information.

ADMISSION PROCESS PSYCHOLOGY – 2019

Registration, Selection and Registration

They will be able to apply for the PPG, holders of a diploma of higher level in Psychology, Social Work, Medicine, Pedagogy, Law, Occupational Therapy, Nursing and other related areas.

At the time of registration, the candidate must present the following documents:

• Diploma of graduation or certificate of completion of course duly authenticated;
• School records;
• Documented Curriculum Vitae;
• Letter of Intent;
• Application for Registration;

SAW. Payment of Registration Fee;

The selection exam will be annual and will take pla

ce in two phases:

• Elimination Phase:
• Examination of Proficiency in English or Spanish;
• Written test.
• Qualifying Phases:
• Curriculum Vitae analysis;
• Interview.

Candidates must obtain a minimum score of seven (7) in each of the qualifying rounds in order to proceed to the other phases.

The written test will be elaborated by the areas of concentration, Forensic Psychology and Community Social Psychology, following a bibliographic relationship published on the UTP Psychology Master’s website.

Both the English or Spanish language proficiency test and the written test will be corrected by the program teachers.

Candidates who are successful in the Elimination Round will go to the Qualifying Round. At this stage the Curriculum Vitae will be evaluated and those selected candidates will participate in the interview.

There will be 30 vacancies annually, of which 15 in the Forensic Psychology concentration area and 15 in the Social Psychology community concentration area.

The students will be distributed among the advisors, respecting the lines of research and interest of the advisor in the student’s project.

The regular student of the Program will enroll, each academic period, at the time and periods stipulated by the coordination.

The request to attend a course as a student listener should be made to the coordinator of the Program, who will give an opinion after listening to the teacher of the discipline.

The counselor should be in agreement with the disciplines that will be taken by the student.

Lessons are held on Mondays and Tuesdays in the morning, afternoon and evening periods.

The PPGPFOR has implemented a variety of initiatives aimed at enhancing the program’s international presence. These include:

1. Institutional Agreements

• Florida International University (United States)
• Universidade Fernando Pessoa (Portugal)
• School of Criminology, University of Leicester (United Kingdom)
• Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (Mozambique)

2. International Faculty on Thesis Committees

• Prof. Dr. Rui Abrunhosa Carvalho Gonçalves – University of Minho, Portugal
• Prof. Dr. Themis Apostolidis – Aix-Marseille University, France
• Prof. Dr. Raquel Bertoldo – Aix-Marseille University, France
• Prof. Dr. Deborah Goldfarb – Florida International University, United States

3. Faculty Participation in International Activities and Events

PPGPFOR faculty and students have participated in international academic events both in-person and virtually, including:

• Sexual Violence Research Initiative Forum (Cape Town, South Africa)
• ISPCAN International Conference (Milan, Italy)

4. Joint Research with International Scholars

PPGPFOR faculty are involved in international research groups that include current Master’s students and, starting in 2025, doctoral students.

Prof. Sidnei Priolo Filho collaborates on four international research projects:

• With Prof. Deborah Goldfarb (Florida International University), studying cross-cultural decision-making and jury behavior;
• With Prof. Carin Perilloux (Southwestern University), investigating cultural differences between Brazilians and Americans in sexual interest and perception;
• With Professors Alexandra Simbine and Rosalina Jorge (Universidade Eduardo Mondlane), conducting training assessments in forensic interviewing with Mozambican professionals;
• He is also a member of a University of Leicester research team examining resilience among child protection professionals.

Prof. Gislei Mocelin Polli initiated a cross-cultural study in collaboration with Prof. Themis Apostolidis (Aix-Marseille University), aiming to identify social representations of obesity and weight-control practices among Brazilians and French participants.

5. Guest Lectures by International Faculty

PPGPFOR has hosted lectures and classes with international scholars, including:

• Prof. Dr. Christine Wekerle – McMaster University (Canada)
• Dr. Hanie Edalati – McGill University (Canada)
• Prof. Dr. Carmit Katz – Tel Aviv University (Israel)

Courses regularly offered include:

• Legal Psychology (biennially), taught by Prof. Deborah Goldfarb (FIU) and Prof. Sidnei Priolo Filho
• Couples and Family Therapy, taught by Prof. Alexandra Simbine (Universidade Eduardo Mondlane) and Prof. Sidnei Priolo Filho

6. Faculty as Reviewers for International Journals

• Prof. Maria Cristina Antunes is on the Scientific Committee of Trends in Psychology
• Prof. Sidnei Priolo Filho is on the editorial board of Child Abuse & Neglect and Child Protection & Practice, and reviews for several international journals
• Prof. Paula Gomide is a reviewer for Revista de Psicología (University of Chile), Acta Comportamentalia, Ciencias Psicológicas, and Frontiers in Psychology
• Prof. Gislei Polli is a reviewer for Ciencias Psicológicas (Uruguay) and Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana(Argentina)

7. Faculty Members in International Scientific Associations

• Professors Maria Cristina Antunes and Sidnei Priolo Filho are members of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN)
• Prof. Sidnei is an honorary member and part of the ISPCAN research group on COVID-19’s impact on child violence

8. Postdoctoral Research Abroad

Prof. Gislei Mocelin Polli completed a postdoctoral fellowship at Aix-Marseille University (France), from December 2019 to July 2020, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Themis Apostolidis. Her research focused on social representations and health practices.

During her fellowship, Prof. Polli:

• Attended seminars and lectures at Aix-Marseille University
• Collaborated on data analysis with Prof. Apostolidis
• Co-authored the article “Representations of food among vegetarians in Brazil: A psychosocial approach”, submitted to the International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science (under review)
• Launched a new study: “Social Representations of Obesity and Weight Control Practices” (currently ongoing)

Each research project within the PPGPFOR is developed by faculty and tied to one of the program’s two main research lines:

• Forensic Assessment, Intervention, and Clinic
• Violence and Society

The complete details of these projects—including research problems, objectives, methodologies, theoretical frameworks, expected outcomes, references, and student involvement—are available through PDF documents accessible on the website.

These documents provide transparency and allow prospective students and researchers to explore ongoing initiatives, identify potential research advisors, and align their academic interests with the program’s expertise.

Access the Sucupira Platform here

(Note: This is a hyperlink on the original page. In digital format, this link redirects to the CAPES Sucupira platform for graduate program transparency and data.)

The Sucupira Platform is the official CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) system used to register and monitor data related to graduate programs in Brazil. Through this platform, information about the PPGPFOR—including faculty, research lines, student progress, and academic production—is publicly available and regularly updated.

• Dr. Adriano Valério dos Santos Azevêdo
  Lattes CV
• Dr. André Vilela Komatsu
  Lattes CV
  Dr. Bruno Bonfá Araujo
  Lattes CV
• Dr. Carlos Aznar Blefari
  Lattes CV
• Dra. Denise de Camargo
  Lattes CV
• Dra. Fernanda Otoni da Silva
  Lattes CV
• Dra. Gislei Mocelin Polli
  Lattes CV
• Dr. João Paulo Araújo Lessa
  Lattes CV
• Dra. Maria Cristina Antunes
  Lattes CV
• Dra. Paula Inez Cunha Gomide
  Lattes CV
• Dr. Sidnei Rinaldo Priolo Filho
  Lattes CV
• Dr. Tiago Gagliano Pinto Alberto
  Lattes CV